Award Banner
Award Banner
Lifestyle

The trick to seeing through a condo showflat (most buyers never do this)

The trick to seeing through a condo showflat (most buyers never do this)

The trick to seeing through a condo showflat (most buyers never do this)
PHOTO: Stackedhomes

There's always a Birkin in the closet, but never a Playstation on the floor.

I'm talking about showflats, and now is an appropriate time, with a slew of new launches like Canberra Crescent Residences, River Green, Promenade Peak, etc., all coming up.

You probably know showflats present an over-optimistic view of the units. But there's still a lingering belief for many, deep down, that with enough renovations/furnishing, they really could have a home like that.

That's why I've been trying, for some time, to find the people who design these showflats. There are definitely specialist firms out there, like D'Perception Ritz and Tong Hai Yang Construction, who are known specialists and fairly direct about their methods.  But ask them about how much it costs, and you're more likely to get a murder confession than a straight answer.

Custom carpentry that's designer-inspired (i.e., doesn't come with the unit)? Designer window treatments? Under-sized and over-designed sofas? Lighting fixtures that look like they were hand-forged by the Gods of Valhalla? Odds are the bill reaches over five digits before you've even left the living room; and that's without counting the wine and shoes, and expensive bags.

Then there's what showflats reveal about buyer demographics

PHOTO: Stackedhomes

Just about every showflat emphasises the wardrobe in the bedroom, and the places to put your designer bags and shoes. 

But how often have you seen a showflat glamourise a man-cave with a PS5, a stack of priceless vintage consoles, and an electric guitar and foosball table wedged into a junior master suite?

(And if they used a scented candle, I like to think it would be a smell that's somewhere between Cheeto dust and Fabreeze)

But this isn't without reason; and it's because designers and developers know that quite often the wife/mother/girlfriend may hold the final veto. It may not be true all the time, but some hidden, calculative researcher has determined it's true often enough.

Then there's the tendency to create a nursery for any condo that has "family-oriented" in the marketing campaign. Now, practically speaking, not a lot of homeowners build full-on nursery rooms: rainbow-unicorn wallpaper and castle-shaped beds are expensive, and children are usually embarrassed by them by the time they're 13 (if not younger).

So why not just have generic children's rooms, like most actual homeowners will set up? The somewhat manipulative answer is that, if the three-bedder has a nursery, it might remind you that someday you may have a child, or another one; so maybe then you'll settle on the three-bedder instead of that "compact two-bedder."

Then there's the way you tend to enter a showflat via the balcony, like some kind of lost pigeon. No showflat I've visited has ever had us enter via the actual front door, which you'd think is an important consideration. But I suppose no one ever looks at a 1.2 metre wide front entrance and decides "wow, I'll sign the OTP now." 

The balcony/living frontage is the most impressive, so that's where we step in, even though in reality, only very skilled burglars get that kind of first impression.

It's a veil of marketing illusions, carefully calibrated to pull your levers.

I think a really cool way to look past that, is to break the layout with reality 

Stacked hasn't let me do this yet, but I totally will once I can get away with it: I think we should get the unit layout and a 3D rendition, and then cram it with what a unit actually accumulates like over time:

Giant sagging sofa, broken massage chair that we won't throw away because it's adapted to our body shape, tennis rackets and golf clubs we used twice and never again, and electronic… things, with cables going all over the room. 

Also, a kitchen that gets piled with assessment books and 10-year series exam papers, because that's the Singaporean family's favourite tuition spot.

If, after all that, the layout can still look decent, we'll know for sure that's a condo unit we can settle in for decades. The showflat reveals it at its best, so now let's see it at its worst.

For now, though, when you step into a showflat, here's a trick you might find useful: look at pictures of your current place on your phone, and visualise that — mess and all — in the space you're observing. This will help you see past the glamour.

Weekly sales roundup (June 30 – July 6)

Top 5 most expensive new sales (by project)

PROJECT NAMEPRICE S$AREA (SQFT)$PSFTENURE
32 GILSTEAD$15,000,0004176$3,592FH
ONE MARINA GARDENS$4,981,6011647$3,02599 yrs (2023)
NAVA GROVE$3,910,8001550$2,52399 yrs (2024)
ELTA$3,611,0001507$2,39699 yrs (2024)
GRAND DUNMAN$3,552,0001421$2,50099 yrs (2022)

Top 5 cheapest new sales (by project)

PROJECT NAMEPRICE S$AREA (SQFT)$PSFTENURE
ONE MARINA GARDENS$1,197,953420$2,85499 yrs (2023)
NOVO PLACE$1,393,000872$1,59899 yrs (2023)
AURELLE OF TAMPINES$1,448,000840$1,72599 yrs (2024)
BLOOMSBURY RESIDENCES$1,663,000678$2,45299 yrs (2024)
SORA$1,851,000732$2,52999 yrs (2023)

Top 5 most expensive resale

PROJECT NAMEPRICE S$AREA (SQFT)$PSFTENURE
LEEDON RESIDENCE$15,800,0008051$1,962FH
GRANGE RESIDENCES$9,850,0002852$3,453FH
SEASCAPE$6,929,0003380$2,05099 yrs (2007)
REGENCY PARK$5,280,0002260$2,336FH
SHELFORD GREEN$5,150,0002842$1,812FH

Top 5 cheapest resale

PROJECT NAMEPRICE S$AREA (SQFT)$PSFTENURE
SKIES MILTONIA$706,000484$1,45899 yrs (2012)
LAVERNE’S LOFT$780,000474$1,647FH
SOL ACRES$781,000495$1,57799 yrs (2014)
SYCAMORE TREE$793,000409$1,939FH
THE TAPESTRY$795,000474$1,67999 yrs (2017)

Top 5 biggest winners

PROJECT NAMEPRICE S$AREA (SQFT)$PSFRETURNSHOLDING PERIOD
GRANGE RESIDENCES$9,850,0002852$3,453$6,503,89121 Years
GRANGE RESIDENCES$9,738,0002852$3,414$5,795,82321 Years
LEEDON RESIDENCE$15,800,0008051$1,962$3,300,0008 Years
PARK INFINIA AT WEE NAM$3,780,0001410$2,681$2,394,00020 Years
PARK INFINIA AT WEE NAM$3,800,0001432$2,654$2,200,00019 Years

Top 5 biggest losers

PROJECT NAMEPRICE S$AREA (SQFT)$PSFRETURNSHOLDING PERIOD
REFLECTIONS AT KEPPEL BAY$2,800,0001733$1,616-$1,380,00012 Years
THE AVENIR$6,900,0002411$2,862-$1,060,0004 Years
OUE TWIN PEAKS$3,680,0001604$2,294-$1,002,0769 Years
ECO$958,888635$1,510$3,8889 Years
STARLIGHT SUITES$1,680,000850$1,976$10,0003 Years

Transaction breakdown

PHOTO: Stackedhomes

Read Also
lifestyle
A first-time condo buyer's guide to evaluating property developers in Singapore

This article was first published in Stackedhomes.

This website is best viewed using the latest versions of web browsers.