The main reason why en blocs don't go through

Singapore’s most talented diplomats are wasted in the property market.
When the government needs expert negotiators, they should be looking for the en-bloc specialists in property firms. Because if anyone can pull off even one successful en-bloc negotiation, they’ll have no problems with easier things, like getting the High Speed Rail built.
When it comes to en-bloc meetings, everyone involved really needs to win; because losing means having to buy a condo at today’s prices. And if you think that sounds upsetting, wait till it happens to you when you’re 82 years old, or after you just spent $100,000 renovating your "forever home" a month before the en-bloc meeting.
If you’re old enough to remember too, a bad en-bloc deal can be very upsetting. Most ex-Gillman Heights owners are probably still very sore about the collective sale (which is now The Interlace).
The resulting atmosphere is like an MMA ring where no contestant is actually allowed to hit anyone; so they just project all their violent frustration into gibberish insults, or — later in the week — teenage-level vandalism.
If you think there’s going to be graphs and math and rational discussions of sale proceeds, you’re going to be sorely disappointed. The first hour alone might just be both sides accusing the other of insensitivity, racism, corruption, and being members of the uncaring elite.
I recently heard from a reader who attended one, and left after an hour as the meeting couldn’t even begin. The residents were arguing over who should get to present, or rather, who should be allowed to present. And proceeded to descend into loud heated shouting because "how dare you raise your voice at my wife".
The representative from the real estate firm needs to rise above the din, and present issues like:
So the condo predates the Vietnam War, and the maintenance fund is down to two rolls of masking tape and positive thinking. Well some might still reject the sale, because of these common sticking points:
Then there’s people who just have an emotional attachment to the place, and it would take more money than a developer — or God — has to uproot them. That’s what happened with Mandarin Gardens.
These factors, more than the wider economy or the actual math, is what causes en-bloc sales to falter. For those who are looking to buy for a collective sale windfall (and have never attended an en-bloc collective sale meeting), be prepared for it to be a long-drawn, and sometimes unpleasant, affair.
PROJECT NAME | PRICE $ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
WATTEN HOUSE | $7,706,000 | 2368 | $3,254 | FH |
SKY EVERTON | $5,380,000 | 1819 | $2,957 | FH |
THE RESERVE RESIDENCES | $4,233,881 | 1625 | $2,605 | 99 yrs (2021) |
MIDTOWN MODERN | $4,179,000 | 1464 | $2,855 | 99 yrs (2019) |
THE CONTINUUM | $3,490,000 | 1249 | $2,795 | FH |
PROJECT NAME | PRICE $ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
GEMS VILLE | $988,000 | 517 | $1,912 | FH |
THE CONTINUUM | $1,463,000 | 560 | $2,614 | FH |
J’DEN | $1,488,000 | 527 | $2,821 | 99 yrs |
THE MYST | $1,555,000 | 700 | $2,223 | 99 yrs (2023) |
PULLMAN RESIDENCES NEWTON | $1,659,240 | 463 | $3,585 | FH |
PROJECT NAME | PRICE $ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
CAPE ROYALE | $6,100,000 | 2508 | $2,432 | 99 yrs (2008) |
MARINA COLLECTION | $5,728,000 | 3272 | $1,750 | 99 yrs (2007) |
REFLECTIONS AT KEPPEL BAY | $4,525,000 | 2637 | $1,716 | 99 yrs (2006) |
HILLTOPS | $4,500,000 | 1550 | $2,903 | FH |
MAPLE WOODS | $3,880,000 | 1787 | $2,171 | FH |
PROJECT NAME | PRICE $ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | TENURE |
PRESTIGE HEIGHTS | $628,000 | 334 | $1,882 | FH |
RIVERBAY | $650,000 | 388 | $1,677 | 999 yrs (1882) |
THE PROMENADE@PELIKAT | $700,000 | 484 | $1,445 | FH |
PARC SOMME | $707,000 | 452 | $1,564 | 99 yrs (2008) |
28 RC SUITES | $750,000 | 452 | $1,659 | FH |
PROJECT NAME | PRICE $ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | RETURNS | HOLDING PERIOD |
KOVAN RESIDENCES | $2,970,000 | 1765 | $1,682 | $1,746,000 | 15 Years |
BRADDELL VIEW | $1,728,000 | 1615 | $1,070 | $1,288,000 | 19 Years |
BOTANNIA | $2,155,000 | 1270 | $1,697 | $1,145,350 | 14 Years |
THE ALPS RESIDENCES | $3,500,000 | 2486 | $1,408 | $1,060,000 | 7 Years |
SOUTHAVEN II | $2,450,000 | 1507 | $1,626 | $1,050,000 | 12 Years |
PROJECT NAME | PRICE $ | AREA (SQFT) | $PSF | RETURNS | HOLDING PERIOD |
HILLTOPS | $4,500,000 | 1550 | $2,903 | -$650,000 | 10 Years |
ONE SHENTON | $2,850,000 | 1582 | $1,801 | -$512,450 | 17 Years |
REFLECTIONS AT KEPPEL BAY | $2,720,000 | 1561 | $1,743 | -$436,300 | 17 Years |
18 WOODSVILLE | $1,230,000 | 732 | $1,680 | -$142,050 | 12 Years |
ROBIN SUITES | $1,230,000 | 538 | $2,285 | -$131,140 | 11 Years |
ALSO READ: 6 surprising property 'red flags' that are bad for some, but good for others
This article was first published in Stackedhomes.